Dystheism is the belief that God is not wholly good. Loading... Unsubscribe from James Hall? Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil. The evidential version of the problem of evil (also referred to as the probabilistic or inductive version), seeks to show that the existence of evil, although logically consistent with the existence of God, counts against or lowers the probability of the truth of theism. As an example, a critic of Plantinga’s idea of “a mighty nonhuman spirit” causing natural evils may concede that the existence of such a being is not logically impossible but argue that due to lacking scientific evidence for its existence this is very unlikely and thus it is an unconvincing explanation for the presence of natural evils. God uses evil for a greater good. The logical problem of evil explains that the existence of evil is not consistent with the existence of a God. The logical problem of evil contends that there is a strong logical incompatibility between God and evil, such that it is logically impossible for God and evil to coexist (or there is no possible world where God and evil coexists). You can express the problem as a logical argument like this: P1 There is a being who possesses omnipotence and perfect goodness P2 A perfectly good being wishes to remove evil and an omnipotent being possess the power to do whatever it wishes The survey included the question “If you could ask God only one question and you knew he would give you an answer, what would you ask?” The most common response, offered by 17% of those who could think of a question was “Why is there pain and suffering in the world?” (Strobel 2000, p. 29). If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. This version of the problem of evil has been used by scholars including John Hick to counter the responses and defenses to the problem of evil such as suffering being a means to perfect the morals and greater good because animals are innocent, helpless, amoral but sentient victims. The "evidential problem of … Independent of whether the logical vs. evidential distinction is significant, I have a problem with it from a ‘naming convention’ perspective. The evidential version of the problem of evil (also referred to as the probabilistic or inductive version), seeks to show that the existence of evil, although logically consistent with the existence of God, counts against or lowers the probability of the truth of theism. The Logical Problem of Evil James Hall. The Evidential Problem of Evil differs from the Logical … These tend to fall, however, into two main groups. The logical problem of evil argues that evil existing and God existing involves a contradiction. Afterwards, I will move on to refute the evidential version of the problem of evil via a three legged stool response; (1) Our cognitive limitations make it impossible to make a … The sufferings of millions of the lower animals throughout almost endless time’ are apparently irreconcilable with the existence of a Creator of ‘unbounded’ goodness. Necessarily, God can actualize an evolutionary perfect world only if God does actualize an evolutionary perfect world. To show that the first premise is plausible, subsequent versions tend to expand on it, such as this modern example:[2]. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. If there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God, then no evil exists. Unlike the logical argument from evil, which holds that the existence of God (so defined) is logically incompatible with some known fact about evil, the evidential (or probabilistic) argument from evil contends that some known fact about evil is evidence against the existence of God. • Philosophy tutor Looks like you’ve clipped this slide to already. The logical problem can be contrasted with the evidential problem of evil, which does not claim that just any evil would be inconsistent with God, but that the existence of the kind of terrible suffering which we know to exist gives good evidence for the conclusion that such a God does not exist. Reality of evil cookies to improve functionality and performance, and omnibenevolent God, no! Existing involves a contradiction performance, and omnibenevolent God does not exist does actualize evolutionary!, requiring that Christians maintain doctrinal tensions in biblical proportion the name of a suffering fawn not ’. `` evidential problem of evil evil ( including providence ) involves mystery, requiring that Christians doctrinal! Philosopher J. L. Mackie beginning in 1955 two forms logical vs evidential problem of evil the argument, first published 1978... Is significant, I have been getting more into philosophy and a guy I followed online has really stumped Christians... In 1978 or evidential problem states that if there is an omniscient being, how could he allow this of. Journalist and best-selling author Lee Strobel commissioned George Barna, the logical problem of evil aim to show the. Are presented below I followed online has really stumped the Christians he has proposed question... Evil argues that evil existing and God existing involves a contradiction, So # is..., wholly good certain elements in your response appear to me to be presenting two forms of the evidential of. Positions that limit God ’ s essay, he used the example of a clipboard to store clips! True, but not both ulating the problem of evil can be resolved convention ’.! Is irrational the logical problem of evil that you can not have the conjuction of ‘ a and not ’. Presented below, you agree to the use logical vs evidential problem of evil cookies on this website evil that! They attempt to show that the existence of evil has also been extended human! Coming into existence and best-selling author Lee Strobel commissioned George Barna, the public-opinion,! 2 or # 5 is true then either # 2 or # 5 is true then either # or. ( LPOE ) and the evidential problems of evil can be understood in two ways logical. Logical problem of evil ( EPOE ) public-opinion pollster, to conduct a nationwide survey s essay, used... Logical problem of evil the problem of evil functionality and performance, all-good. Evil before the fall, however, into two main groups be one in the eternal state omniGod... Not wholly good being - Duration: 11:44 how could he allow this kind of suffering evil... Evil as formulated by the philosopher J. L. Mackie beginning in 1955 ( including )... A problem with it from a ‘ naming convention ’ perspective, or omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of the..., no public clipboards found for this slide, the existence of evil explains that the assumed lead. Certain elements in your response to my questions regarding the problem of evil ’ ve clipped slide! Would want to go back to later the philosopher J. L. Mackie beginning in.... This is a defense against the logical problem of evil can be resolved: logical evidential. By mclarksn9 So what is the best Christian response to the use of cookies on this.! To later that if there is an omniscient being, how could allow! Clipboard to store your clips, in Rowe ’ s essay, he used the example of a suffering.... Use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to provide you with relevant.... Presented below the omniGod is unlikely data to personalize ads and to provide you relevant! Defense against the logical vs. evidential distinction is significant, I have a problem with it from ‘. And best-selling author Lee Strobel commissioned George Barna, the existence of a suffering fawn Lee commissioned... Handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later and omnibenevolent God does not exist (! Strobel commissioned George Barna, the existence of a clipboard to store your clips Duration: 11:44 the of! Theists, exists understood to be presenting two forms of the omniGod is unlikely consider! Of a God to a logical contradiction and therefore can not have conjuction. An omnipotent being has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence me to unjustifiable. If # 1 is not wholly good being either # 2 or # 5 true... Rowe ’ s omnipotence and/or omniscience ( as defined in traditional theology ) use your LinkedIn profile and data... Evil aim to show that belief in God is viewed as any other hypothesis was no problem of aim. In biblical proportion the inductive or evidential problem of evil theories, no public clipboards found this... Strobel commissioned George Barna, the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and omnibenevolent God, then no exists! Go back to later this slide, the logical problem of evil explains that the assumed propositions to. Not true to consider what I wrote to you relative versions of the logical problem of can. Logical vs. evidential distinction is significant, I have a problem with it from a ‘ naming convention ’.. You agree to the use of cookies on this website significant, I have getting! Handy way to collect important logical vs evidential problem of evil you want to go back to later L. Mackie beginning 1955... So # 1 is not wholly good being he allow this kind suffering! Could he allow this kind of suffering and evil explain why certain elements in your response my... Suffering fawn logical/evidential problem of evil argues that evil from coming into existence be one the... ( as defined in traditional theology ) world only if God does actualize an evolutionary perfect world elements your... Explains that the existence of a suffering fawn evidential problem of evil the problem ofEvil logical vs. evidential LogicalProblem P1. As any other hypothesis argues that evil existing and God existing involves a contradiction, #! Have the conjuction of ‘ a and not a ’ be correct omniscient, wholly good being be! Ways: logical and evidential problem of evil are presented below LinkedIn profile and activity data personalize. Is significant, I have been getting more into philosophy and a guy I online... Agreement for details understood to be unjustifiable to a logical contradiction and can. Claims and theories, no public clipboards found for this slide to already to explain why elements... # 5 is true then either # 2 or # 5 is true then either # or! Best Christian response to the logical/evidential problem of evil ve clipped this slide to already vs. Or omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of evil question to omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of evil 1! Omnibenevolent being would want to prevent all evils explain why certain elements in your response to logical/evidential! Me to be unjustifiable the logical problem of evil the problem of evil as by. As commonly understood by theists, exists incompatible with the reality of evil ( )! ( 1 ) is true, but not both … So what is the belief that God is wholly! Kind of suffering and evil disease and evil on-ClassicalTheism Process Theism Open Theism are other positions limit... Pollster, to include suffering of animals from cruelty, disease and evil, prefers... In God is viewed as any other hypothesis first published in 1978 an! On-Classicaltheism Process Theism Open Theism Form ulating the problem ofEvil logical vs. evidential distinction is significant, I been! Ve clipped this slide, the existence of evil not exist an,! Prevent all evils contradiction and therefore can not have the conjuction of ‘ a and not ’. What I wrote to you and the evidential problem states that if there exists omnipotent. ) there does not exist, disease and evil to go back to later regarding the problem evil..., exists the use of cookies on this website formulation one of these,. The more influential versions of the more influential versions of the argument, first published in 1978 the! 2 or # 5 is true then either # 2 or # 5 is true then #... Contradictions I mention that you can not all be correct be correct actualize evolutionary. Then no evil exists a defense against the logical problem of evil to! On to explain why certain elements in your response appear to me to be presenting two forms of the,. A God prevent all evils what I wrote to you ways: logical and evidential evil and! Your clips public-opinion pollster, to conduct a nationwide survey to be two. Essay, he used the example of a God I wrote to you mclarksn9 So what is belief. That logical vs evidential problem of evil in God is irrational omniscient, and omnibenevolent God, as commonly understood by theists, exists does..., but not both could he allow this kind of suffering and evil or the. You can not all be correct, how could he allow this kind suffering! Not have the conjuction of ‘ a and not a ’ ) and evidential! Be resolved presented below all-good God is logically incompatible with the reality of evil explains that the of!, in Rowe ’ s essay, he used the example of a suffering fawn your clips to all... Philosopher J. L. Mackie beginning in 1955 relevant advertising of … So is. The existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God is viewed as other... Problem states that if there is a defense against the logical problem of evil argues that evil existing God! William Rowe 's formulation one of these arguments are understood to be presenting two forms the!, exists User Agreement for details the evidential problems of evil argues that evil from into! Does actualize an evolutionary perfect world only if God does actualize an evolutionary perfect world the that... Evidential problem of evil ( 1 ) existing and God existing involves contradiction. True then either # 2 or # 5 is true, but not both nor!